Discussions

sorry im linux /android :D

<Code Omitted>

You could declare the act() method in the Enemy class as 'final', and have it perform whatever check you like before calling another method ("enemyAct()" or whatever you like to call it). <Code Omitted> Then subclasses can override the enemyAct method, but not the act method.

'getObjects(class)' is a World method that returns a List of Objects of the specified class. Since it is a World method, we must prefix it with 'getWorld()', which is an Actor method that returns the world that an actor is in. Since you are in the act (or a sub-method that it calls) in the badger class, it would be the world that the badger being netted is in. The prefix for 'getWorld()' in this case is understood (the 'this' keyword -- referring to the badger). Now that we have a list of 'truck' objects, we should make sure that the list is not empty. The 'isEmpty()' method of the List

^Thank you it's kinda hard to see where you're missing when dealing with lots of words and when it was compiled w/o errors.

thanks for the information its much better to do the thing in your one line code thx there for

If you only have one fisherman in the world, then in the second actor's class, add the following method: <Code Omitted>

If you use <Code Omitted>the last line will always return 'null' as you already received the info in the 'if' statement and the info in Greenfoot was nullified. That is why something in the form of SPower's method needs to be used.

<Code Omitted>

the problem may be the “getX()” method actually return the position of the platform, not the“actor”

@Builderboy2005 OK, you win :D

never mind, I misunderstand intersect for interest... :(

If the name of your sub-class of World was 'MyWorld', and the variable in the world was 'myVar', then in the actor class: <Code Omitted>Replacements: 'MyWorld' to the name of your sub-class of world 'int' to the variable type needed 'myVar' to the name of the variable in your sub-class of wo

thank you, i will add your suggestions to the code and see what happens :)

Yes. UserInfo.isStorageAvailable() only checks to ensure that the user is logged in (if the user is not signed on, then storage will not be available). Locally, if you set the preferred user to an empty string (blank), the method would then return 'false'. It is best not to mess with the 'storage.csv' file (treat it as read-only). You can, however, just delete the file, and have a new one created from within the scenario by way of the 'store()' call (for testing purposes).