This site requires JavaScript, please enable it in your browser!
Greenfoot back

danpost's Comments

Back to danpost's profile

HTML5 does not like this, I guess. Clicks stop working after a few.
Updated to run in HTML5 -- but it runs very slow compared to the speed it runs in the greenfoot application.
@Yehuda, correct. the octagram is the eight-pointed star that is drawn; the octagon is the eight-sided shape found in the center of the star.
@JeevaT, I am having a bit of a time trying to locate it. Hopefully, I will find it somewhere.
@TheGoldenProof, it is back up.
I guess it makes sense the the ones that take many steps would end up on along similar numbers as the many shorter paths take up most the other numbers.
I can understand numbers closer to one being more commonly reached. However, a common high maximum for quite a few relatively small numbers was a bit surprising.
And 463 takes 128 steps, reaching as high as 9232 before coming down. The number 73 goes up to the same height, taking 115 steps. In fact, the others I had mentions (47, 97 and 107) all reach a maximum of 9232 -- curious.
Your 47 takes 104 steps. Interestingly enough, the number 107 takes exactly 100 steps. However, 97 takes a whopping 118 steps.