This site requires JavaScript, please enable it in your browser!
Greenfoot back

danpost's Comments

Back to danpost's profile

@kiarocks, thanks. I fixed it. There were two places I had to inspect for his UserInfo to be found. I had forgot about the other one.
@kiarocks, was that a random set-up?
There is actually a way to score that much, but it would probably takes quite a bit of time to do it. I would not say it does not involve cheating, but the score would be taken up to take amount normally by the program.
There is no way to actually prove anything, here. Although, it does appear that the image on photobucket was doctored. That is, at the vertical where the triangle was stopped, there sems to be missing walls (one above and one below, exactly at the same point). With that, and how far the image was inside the wall, as well as the fact that the first 5 digits in the score are all 8's, and also how long it would take to accrue a score so high so soon after the scenario was published, all lead me into the believe that things are not all what they appear to be, in this case.
@Ward, setting the speed to more than 100 does not produce an error or crash the game. Any number given greater than 100 sets the speed at 100.
Yeah, it looked like his triangle was in pretty deep. It would have stopped with just an edge touching (if even that).
@erdelf, I do not think I will try, but thanks. Did you find a way to buck the system?
Ok, not without touching a red wall. I got 6563 before touching one.
I could go on forever! (maybe)