Discussions

Ah, thanks a ton. I didn't know that JS would play into this as a factor but now I know. The scenario is now working properly and is, in fact, more efficient because it isn't re-reading the txt file over and over again like it had to before.

this is awesome!! thank you so much!

Well i tried with <Code Omitted> and its working perfectly, if only i could show like a list with what commands the user typed so he could know a little bit of the sintax to write a program , but its already good enough, thanks for the help

I was able to fix it by moving everything to the world class. I think the issue was something else and not with the txt file reading method I had. I was able to fix it though, so thank you

A class, whether World, Actor or any other, is a blueprint (or part of one) for a type of object. Its fields maintain the different states that its objects can have and its methods provide the behavior for its objects (things these type objects can do). For each object, its states can be change and its behaviors can be utilized throughout the object's life (or its existence -- until all references to that object are lost). I s

It will only work in an Actor subclass that extends the Animal class or one that has a canSee method within itself. As an alternative, you can use the isTouching method.

Swap lines 16 and 17 in the unJoueur class. Or replace the class code with this: <Code Omitted>

It should be obvious as to why it always says "true".

I just realised I never called the resume() method in act(), easy fix! Thank you! I should of realised that sooner haha :')))))

You could implemet this in your world class: <Code Omitted>You have to paste that under the <Code Omitted>

I think we will need to see more of the squirrel class code.

First, you cannot mix alpha characters with numeric character outside of double quotes (to make them strings). Second, you cannot list multiple things under the same field name (custID) -- unless it is an array or list. Third, those listed items on line 11 appear to be account ids, not customer ids (maybe the field name should be changed). Fourth, the listed values are not all checking accounts. I do not know why you would put them all in a class called CheckingAccount (probably should be in Account class).

Thanks danpost! Works just fine!

<Code Omitted>

ok thanks.