There is no method with that name that has two int parameters. If you want a number between 20 and 30 inclusive, then use:

@Lilly123 Not necessarily. The one line of code that was given is the whole problem. The requirement is an 'int' and the compiler found two. As you posted your message after danpost, you should have been able to see that from there, even if you didn't know the problem by yourself.

+1

In case you're not being sarcastic, +1 basically means an upvote (because he agrees to what you said)

-1/2 Lilly123 may not have seen my post as there was only about a two minute difference in posting times. As well, Lilly123, may not be familiar with that error message and on top of that, one line of code, in most cases, is not enough to solve an issue (this was a rare case).

I take my "+1" back. You dont deserve it.

I thought I remember seeing one of your posts say "9 hours ago" and the other say "6 hours ago" before I posted, maybe I took too quick of a glance. All your "may"s, besides for the first, have been addressed in my first post. "one line of code ... is the whole problem" "if you didn't know the problem" So that means I already took those into account (even the first).

I totally understand what you had said. My point is that you went under the presumption that Lilly123 had seen my post and due to that, the problem should have been made known (which is where you used "As you posted your message after danpost, you should have been able to see that from there, even if you didn't know the problem ...". My point is valid, however you try to disprove it.

@Yehuda, I do not really understand why you had to respond to the post by Lilly123 at all. Better would have been to wait for Acituanbus to reply with a confirmation of a fix or some continued issue, especially when you knew that my reply was probably enough. That way, Lilly123 would find whether the reply given was to point or not (and all this could have been avoided).

I think I might agree on that, it is a valid question to (on - ?) my part. It might have been that I thought at the time that what was necessary was someone who knew the problem, and I wanted to stop a lead onto a false trail of posting more code.