This site requires JavaScript, please enable it in your browser!
Greenfoot back
Twitter Twitter.hover

Report as inappropriate.

Zamoht
Zamoht presents ...

2012/7/4

BigDecimal Demo (pi calculator)

The title says it all!
(BigDecimal is a way to get more decimals than you do when using double or float)
I think it's a bit confusing, and there might be other uses of the Bigdecimal class, but here is one of them.

4632 views / 22 in the last 7 days

2 votes | 0 in the last 7 days

Tags: demo with-source calculator pi bigdecimal

open in greenfoot
Your browser does not support the canvas tag.
Embed | View applet version
A new version of this scenario was uploaded on Wed Jul 04 15:23:29 UTC 2012
ZamohtZamoht

2012/7/4

@tylers source is there now. @mjrb4 i added the calculation to the act method, because I was worried about crashing if I used a while or for command. @SPower you're right.
SPowerSPower

2012/7/4

That's one of the slower versions of calculating pi. You better use this: pi/4 = 4 * arctan(1/5) - arctan(1/239)
ZamohtZamoht

2012/7/4

This is a BigDecimal demo, and I kinda like the way it calculates slowly. I know that this page is in danish, but if you really wont the value of pi check the bottom of this pdf: http://www.matematiksider.dk/pi/tallet_pi.pdf
ZamohtZamoht

2012/7/4

*want
A new version of this scenario was uploaded on Wed Jul 04 17:06:26 UTC 2012 Made the calculation a little faster. I'm abit slow, but I found out that the size of the BigDecimal scale, made the execute run slower if it was too high. (I changed the scale from 10000 - I thought it would be more precise- to 120). The program is still calculating slowly.
MatheMagicianMatheMagician

2012/7/4

@SPower the way you calculate the arctan function is this arc(x) = x - x^3/3 + x^5/5 - x^7/7 Its just that pi/4 = arctan(1) or 1-1/3+1/5-1/7. So i think Zamoht's method is faster. @Zamoht, I am impressed by your use of BigDecimals. I tried doing so but I had trouble with it. I will use some your code in my series formula scenario (I will give you credit and like your scenario).
MatheMagicianMatheMagician

2012/7/4

Oops, for some reason I am having trouble liking your scenario. :< anyway, I'll try again: you deserve it.
MatheMagicianMatheMagician

2012/7/4

Also, I think the only reason it takes so long to calculate pi is because you are only making one calculation per act cycle. I tried it out using a for loop to calculate 100 times per act frame and the laptop I'm using handled it like pi (pun intended).
ZamohtZamoht

2012/7/4

@MatheMagician thank you so much. Feel free to use the code, hope you can get use of it. The idea about making loops is good. Thanks again!

See all comments

Want to leave a comment? You must first log in.

Who likes this?

Freddie MatheMagician